Difference between revisions of "Talk:ConditionsForFabLabLabel"
(initial comment by Riccardo) |
m (styling) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Via Sherry, one "riccardo_giordani@runbox.com" complained about the "conditions for FabLab label" -- but although invited could not bother to add the discussion to the relevant page. So on his behalf and because I feel the discussion is an important one, I add his complaints for everybody to react: | Via Sherry, one "riccardo_giordani@runbox.com" complained about the "conditions for FabLab label" -- but although invited could not bother to add the discussion to the relevant page. So on his behalf and because I feel the discussion is an important one, I add his complaints for everybody to react: | ||
| − | ---------- Forwarded message ---------- | + | ---------- Forwarded message |
| − | From: <riccardo_giordani@runbox.com> | + | ---------- |
| − | Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM | + | From: <riccardo_giordani@runbox.com><br /> |
| − | Subject: Fablab only for the rich | + | Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM<br /> |
| − | To: fab-info@cba.mit.edu | + | Subject: Fablab only for the rich<br /> |
| + | To: fab-info@cba.mit.edu<br /> | ||
| − | + | I would like to provide my feedback on the idea to constraint the FABLAB logo, something that I have seen done by the Island fablab : | |
| − | I would like to provide my feedback on the idea to constraint the FABLAB logo, | + | |
| − | something that I have seen done by the Island fablab : | + | |
http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/ConditionsForFabLabLabel | http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/ConditionsForFabLabLabel | ||
| − | A single process equal in all fablab is equal to killl any innovation . | + | A single process equal in all fablab is equal to killl any innovation . This would bring fablab to the level of a standard prototyping copyshop. all using the same 2 software and 3 machines ? |
| − | This would bring fablab to the level of a standard prototyping | + | |
| − | copyshop. all using the same 2 software and 3 machines ? | + | |
| − | To have the same set of machines is opening a huge discussion | + | To have the same set of machines is opening a huge discussion that could be not transparet, with also including the doupts of bribery , because the machine producers are very interested, very interested. |
| − | that could be not transparet, with also including the doupts of | + | (nice roland link on island page : http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/Portal:Equiment ) |
| − | bribery , because the machine producers are very interested, very interested. | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | Fablab is also doing things Low cost , | + | Fablab is also doing things Low cost , developing low cost process , but the direction is now to disqualify all the fablab that can not get at least 50000 Euro . Forget any African country , any poor country ... |
| − | developing low cost process , | + | |
| − | but the direction is now to disqualify all the fablab that | + | |
| − | can not get at least 50000 Euro . Forget any African | + | |
| − | country , any poor country ... | + | |
Fablab is now only for the Rich !!!!! | Fablab is now only for the Rich !!!!! | ||
| Line 34: | Line 24: | ||
Regards Riccardo . | Regards Riccardo . | ||
| − | P.S: innovation does not follow a standard process, | + | P.S: innovation does not follow a standard process, do we want to do that ? |
| − | + | ||
| − | ---------- End forwarded message ---------- | + | ---------- End forwarded message |
| + | ---------- | ||
Comments? Reactions? | Comments? Reactions? | ||
Revision as of 09:50, 21 July 2011
Via Sherry, one "riccardo_giordani@runbox.com" complained about the "conditions for FabLab label" -- but although invited could not bother to add the discussion to the relevant page. So on his behalf and because I feel the discussion is an important one, I add his complaints for everybody to react:
Forwarded message
From: <riccardo_giordani@runbox.com>
Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Fablab only for the rich
To: fab-info@cba.mit.edu
I would like to provide my feedback on the idea to constraint the FABLAB logo, something that I have seen done by the Island fablab :
http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/ConditionsForFabLabLabel
A single process equal in all fablab is equal to killl any innovation . This would bring fablab to the level of a standard prototyping copyshop. all using the same 2 software and 3 machines ?
To have the same set of machines is opening a huge discussion that could be not transparet, with also including the doupts of bribery , because the machine producers are very interested, very interested. (nice roland link on island page : http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/Portal:Equiment )
Fablab is also doing things Low cost , developing low cost process , but the direction is now to disqualify all the fablab that can not get at least 50000 Euro . Forget any African country , any poor country ...
Fablab is now only for the Rich !!!!!
Thanks Regards Riccardo .
P.S: innovation does not follow a standard process, do we want to do that ?
End forwarded message
Comments? Reactions?
