Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jhlewisjr"
From Fab Lab Wiki - by NMÍ Kvikan
m (Welcome!) |
(question re AAAA) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
You will probably want to read the [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents help pages]. | You will probably want to read the [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents help pages]. | ||
Again, welcome and have fun! trox [at] fabfolk [.] com 10:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC) | Again, welcome and have fun! trox [at] fabfolk [.] com 10:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hi, I’ve just seen you added your lab at Côte d’Opale -- wonderful! | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since you graded your lab AAAA I tried to check the facts ... but your site is silent on 3 topics | ||
+ | |||
+ | * access (except a note that members of the Tektos Business Club can use the lab at "conditions privilégiées” ... so I challenge your rating “A” since there is not more information | ||
+ | * charter: you don’t reference the charter or any points mentioned in there on your site ... so I challenge your rating “A” and amend it to “C” | ||
+ | * you do have all the capabilities, which gives you an “A” for that | ||
+ | * participation in the network is hard to gauge remotely ;) but you hardly mention any relation with other labs (except the AAP) | ||
+ | |||
+ | can you clarify? | ||
+ | |||
+ | --trox [at] fabfolk [.] com 12:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:02, 20 October 2014
Welcome to Fab Lab Wiki - by NMÍ Kvikan! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! trox [at] fabfolk [.] com 10:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I’ve just seen you added your lab at Côte d’Opale -- wonderful!
Since you graded your lab AAAA I tried to check the facts ... but your site is silent on 3 topics
- access (except a note that members of the Tektos Business Club can use the lab at "conditions privilégiées” ... so I challenge your rating “A” since there is not more information
- charter: you don’t reference the charter or any points mentioned in there on your site ... so I challenge your rating “A” and amend it to “C”
- you do have all the capabilities, which gives you an “A” for that
- participation in the network is hard to gauge remotely ;) but you hardly mention any relation with other labs (except the AAP)
can you clarify?
--trox [at] fabfolk [.] com 12:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)