Talk:ConditionsForFabLabLabel: Difference between revisions
initial comment by Riccardo |
m styling |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Via Sherry, one "riccardo_giordani@runbox.com" complained about the "conditions for FabLab label" -- but although invited could not bother to add the discussion to the relevant page. So on his behalf and because I feel the discussion is an important one, I add his complaints for everybody to react: | Via Sherry, one "riccardo_giordani@runbox.com" complained about the "conditions for FabLab label" -- but although invited could not bother to add the discussion to the relevant page. So on his behalf and because I feel the discussion is an important one, I add his complaints for everybody to react: | ||
---------- Forwarded message ---------- | ---------- Forwarded message | ||
From: <riccardo_giordani@runbox.com> | ---------- | ||
Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM | From: <riccardo_giordani@runbox.com><br /> | ||
Subject: Fablab only for the rich | Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM<br /> | ||
To: fab-info@cba.mit.edu | Subject: Fablab only for the rich<br /> | ||
To: fab-info@cba.mit.edu<br /> | |||
I would like to provide my feedback on the idea to constraint the FABLAB logo, something that I have seen done by the Island fablab : | |||
I would like to provide my feedback on the idea to constraint the FABLAB logo, | |||
something that I have seen done by the Island fablab : | |||
http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/ConditionsForFabLabLabel | http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/ConditionsForFabLabLabel | ||
A single process equal in all fablab is equal to killl any innovation . | A single process equal in all fablab is equal to killl any innovation . This would bring fablab to the level of a standard prototyping copyshop. all using the same 2 software and 3 machines ? | ||
This would bring fablab to the level of a standard prototyping | |||
copyshop. all using the same 2 software and 3 machines ? | |||
To have the same set of machines is opening a huge discussion | To have the same set of machines is opening a huge discussion that could be not transparet, with also including the doupts of bribery , because the machine producers are very interested, very interested. | ||
that could be not transparet, with also including the doupts of | (nice roland link on island page : http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/Portal:Equiment ) | ||
bribery , because the machine producers are very interested, very interested. | |||
Fablab is also doing things Low cost , | Fablab is also doing things Low cost , developing low cost process , but the direction is now to disqualify all the fablab that can not get at least 50000 Euro . Forget any African country , any poor country ... | ||
developing low cost process , | |||
but the direction is now to disqualify all the fablab that | |||
can not get at least 50000 Euro . Forget any African | |||
country , any poor country ... | |||
Fablab is now only for the Rich !!!!! | Fablab is now only for the Rich !!!!! | ||
| Line 34: | Line 24: | ||
Regards Riccardo . | Regards Riccardo . | ||
P.S: innovation does not follow a standard process, | P.S: innovation does not follow a standard process, do we want to do that ? | ||
---------- End forwarded message ---------- | ---------- End forwarded message | ||
---------- | |||
Comments? Reactions? | Comments? Reactions? | ||
Revision as of 09:50, 21 July 2011
Via Sherry, one "riccardo_giordani@runbox.com" complained about the "conditions for FabLab label" -- but although invited could not bother to add the discussion to the relevant page. So on his behalf and because I feel the discussion is an important one, I add his complaints for everybody to react:
Forwarded message
From: <riccardo_giordani@runbox.com>
Date: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Fablab only for the rich
To: fab-info@cba.mit.edu
I would like to provide my feedback on the idea to constraint the FABLAB logo, something that I have seen done by the Island fablab :
http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/ConditionsForFabLabLabel
A single process equal in all fablab is equal to killl any innovation . This would bring fablab to the level of a standard prototyping copyshop. all using the same 2 software and 3 machines ?
To have the same set of machines is opening a huge discussion that could be not transparet, with also including the doupts of bribery , because the machine producers are very interested, very interested. (nice roland link on island page : http://www.fablab.is/w/index.php/Portal:Equiment )
Fablab is also doing things Low cost , developing low cost process , but the direction is now to disqualify all the fablab that can not get at least 50000 Euro . Forget any African country , any poor country ...
Fablab is now only for the Rich !!!!!
Thanks Regards Riccardo .
P.S: innovation does not follow a standard process, do we want to do that ?
End forwarded message
Comments? Reactions?